US and allied military and intelligence information gathered in Afghanistan suggesting that agents of the Russian secret services held a fund for the reward of Afghan fighters, American and Afghan soldiers killed, but senior officials are divided as to give much credit intelligence raw. CIA officers and Command in Afghanistan Special Operations (SOCOM) concluded from human sources the information is based, the Russians were, as an official, on condition of anonymity, said, expressed, fighters American Taliban and Afghans to kill “incentivize” against America reward for the defeat of Russia in 1989, and disturbing the peace talks sponsored by the United States between the Taliban and the Afghan government. The National Security Agency, but he expressed less confidence than the CIA or SOCOM because this was no convincing evidence on intercepted Taliban and Russian communication. “People are convinced decrease,” said an official familiar with the matter, with reference to US personnel in the region of Afghanistan. “But some analysts (brain) have expressed doubts.” The Trump administration of these divisions about the alleged Russian bounty system detected since the first system by The New York Times on June 26, President Donald Trump tweeted two days after intelligence agents told him they have reported credible intelligence does not take into account, so it was not reported to him, the vice president Mike pence, and other senior officials. White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany stressed the dispute June 29 to reporters, said that disagreements remain about the alleged Russian campaign Bounty. “There is no consensus within the intelligence of these allegations and, in fact, there are dissenting views of some in the intelligence than the precision that what is being reported. And the accuracy of the underlying allegations continue to be evaluated” said McEnany. “Intelligence is checked before it reaches the President of the United States. And in this case has not been verified.” But despite the different level of confidence in the intelligence field, is the subject of departmental memo and discussed in these meetings, many officials said, including at least one in the White House, but this is was what one official called “the level of work.” And because the matter involved a possible Russian role in killing American soldiers, he said some officials, has almost certainly at least a short daily President (PDB), top-secret intelligence summary delivered in person it would seem, and sometimes just to writing to the President and senior officials. Although Trump with Russia on US officials, on other important issues, including the interference of Russia in 2016 presidential elections, the CIA director Gina reel and other officials would have included in the PDB has at least one side as it is commonly called . The Associated Press reported that senior officials of the White House awards were made early in 2019. care payments incurred for disputes concerning the intelligence in the PDB, often found in the notes document or text boxes, officials compiling 2: 00-04: 00 every morning. In previous governments, usually the president or receive PDB first reading, but in the administration Trump, Pence, and Homeland Security Secretary Mike Pompeo Robert O’Brien is often first read and work from material that does not think conclusively especially when it contradicts the Trump policy, said a former high-ranking CIA. Although Trump is specifically informed about a subject, said officials familiar with the briefings he always pay attention not only up or pursue matters that he does not care how the former National Security Advisor, John Bolton, says the his new book. McEnany would not confirm or deny that intelligence is involved in one of PDBs during a press conference on June 30, he said the reporter was “a top secret document.” She said, however, that Trump reads the daily briefings. states “The President. It is consumed verbal intelligence,” he said. “This president, I will tell you is the person briefed on the planet Earth, when it comes to threats that we face.” Intelligence often reach different conclusions, usually based on their sources of information. The National Security Agency has had, for example, a lower level of confidence than the CIA and the FBI in the evaluation in January 2017 that Russia interfered in the presidential election of 2016. Another former human intelligence official recalled the debates inside the US intelligence more than ten years on the sizes were on Taliban fighters to $25,000 for American soldiers and financing $50,000 top US level for employees while serving in Afghanistan. Defense Intelligence sources, the Russian government was probably closed the money as part of a campaign, which provides the US occupation of Afghanistan, as well as the United States had sabotaged the Soviet occupation in 1980 in a similar fashion to the defeat, the ‘ former officer said, speaking anonymously to discuss the sensitive matter. But even then it found officials of US intelligence that with high confidence, he added. In this case, he said some officials are skeptical about the Russian members of the Taliban or other groups would reward to risk something to do, they are already doing. “Why should they have the option to take, to know how to have that subject with him would put Trump sees re-elected in a difficult situation when (Russian President Vladimir) Putin wants it?”, Asked a second official. However, other current and former US and British officials have said that some of the Russian military elderly of today and intelligence were junior officers in Afghanistan, when supported Mujahideen United States Soviet occupation forces continued in 1989, out of the country and can still have an ax loop, “Putin’s great military parade was a celebration of what has been a glorious Soviet victory over the Nazis, but the Russians never forget their defeats, either,” said a US official. “Hell, I still hate the Tartar Mongols.” In addition, a civil servant, the ratio of 29115 units, is the credible award of the GRU, Russian military intelligence agency, the other support was politically risky operations, including the Taliban years provided a poisoned former Russian spy and his daughter in the UK in 2018 the split between the intelligence underscores the challenge of interpreting the intelligence agencies collected using different tools. In response to the objections of the NSA confirming the alleged Russian control, a CIA officer has not responded dryly intercepted communications had “Big surprise. The Russians did not call their friends and say,” I’ll give you $1,000 cash for each American infidels to kill you? They use courier -. No phones and texts “A Taliban spokesman denied the allegation that members of the group for Bounty killed US troops from Russia on Tuesday, referring to a previous statement, on June 27 by the group that the Taliban” is so on charity any intelligence organ or abroad is not necessary and does not need someone to set goals. “The CIA has confirmed does not claim his statement on the public program emirate Islamic Russian.” If the intelligence assessments of the development of the initial tactics relationships often need additional data collection and validation, “he said in a statement Reel June 29. Inflict” Hostile US using proxies in the war damage to US interests zones and troops is a constant concern for a long period of time. CIA will continue to monitor each track; we collect with critical objective eye analyzes information; To protect and short of reliable intelligence on US forces around the world in action “Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman also said that the Department of Defense, including the NSA does not have” no evidence confirming “the report confirms, however, -With that “continues to evaluate the intelligence that the Russian GRU agents were threatening activities against us and coalition forces engaged in Afghanistan.” reporting by Kimberly Dozier and WJ Hennigan in Washington
secret ballot if Russia does not pay the Taliban to strike at American soldiers. This does not mean Trump had not known about them
