You might like to talk COVID-19 test pattern No One save thousands of lives

You might like to talk COVID-19 test pattern No One save thousands of lives

With more scarce hard data in terms of ownership and deployment of COVID-19, many governments and health officials say the appropriate health and to formulate economic policy. As a result, a bit ‘lead, even if it is not effective in all countries a war based on the dynamics of a gambling ring. This, in turn, generates considerable anxiety for when lockdowns could close and could start the first steps towards economic activities occur. The lack of data and the resulting lack of real purpose is perhaps best shown in the United States, where the federal government of the individual states left to decide when, how widespread it is no clarity about COVID-19 is currently being reopened. What state governments should do it is to formulate a reopening procedure based on the selection and testing of a representative sample of the population. There is now abundant evidence that asymptomatic individuals are the most important COVID-19 speakers and determined as such the person tracking is the only way for further waves to stop the contagion. Tests have always been of the utmost importance, but this should not be seen as a warrant large-scale testing. This option is clearly not practical and should be urgently replaced by the well-designed test strategies tested that will determine the rate of infection in the local community of individuals, as well as a strong influence on the general circulation and spread of the virus within the population more wide range. make based on this information, contact tracing and intelligent mitigation strategies that the infection curve of ensuring flat seal and the health care system can work with their means. COVID-19 has shown that it can infect people regardless of age, race, gender, and geography, and, therefore, has proved unpredictable and difficult to contain. This unpredictability was to be tested reflected the differing strategies of different governments around the world. Countries such as Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States mainly test patients with severe symptoms and are largely held to test asymptomatic individuals. In contrast, in countries like Germany, Iceland and South Korea, the moderately symptomatic cases test speed has rapidly expanded in asymptomatic individuals who work in jobs that have infected where it should be, have a high probability virus to many other distribution. This includes, for example, medical staff and workers in the transport nodes. These different approaches may have been dictated by several logistical constraints, but it is those countries realize that testing strategies and looking for smart contacts have dealt in turn be more successful in curbing COVID-19 For example, Iceland, South Korea, Australia and Singapore all strong control and investigation have contact persons and their initiatives of infection and mortality figures are a fraction of the US-years. A central element of the exit strategy for countries like the United States, Italy and the UK, seems simple: a serological test program on a representative sample of the population for development, but also to gather information on demographic characteristics such as age, sex , number of children, the nature of the associations sector of employment, skills, social and labor. serological tests detect the presence of antibodies to COVID-19 and a purpose for some reason. able to detect the PCR test, the detection of RNA viruses only reveal an infection current or recent. antibody tests, on the other hand, theoretically, someone who has been exposed to the virus a few months ago to identify. By working with this method to test the government will be able to capture a clear picture of the extent to which the virus has already spread and identify trends in geographic regions and individual characteristics such as age, gender, work areas and skills. Completion of this representative sample would be relatively easy and inexpensive to implement. It ‘also easy because countries can use representative samples of the population that are regularly used for socio-economic surveys. Such tests are for instance, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States could ‘, Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey “will be adapted to perform. Second, the data can be collected, even though the standard statistical methods for analysis that the aid derive a valuable analysis of the body, throughout the majority of the population with respect. There are aspects of the construction of these test programs that need to be carefully managed. for example, they could be vulnerable to the results that indicate erroneously the presence of COVID-19 in a particular region, or vice versa, to identify areas that fictitiously low rates of infection. in both examples, the validation test is crucial. Through the collection and statistical analysis of these data, governments will be able to make an informed choice and to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages inherent in every political, social distancing relax before a vac Sino is available. to reflect formulate an exit strategy without that information as a coin-the proverbial gambling.
Picture copyright by Valeria Macon AFP / Getty Images